EC 311 - Intermediate Microeconomics
2025
Outline
Topics
We will label Market Supply as \(Q_{S}\)
And it is obtained in the exact same way as market demand
\[ Q_{S} = 10 \cdot Q^{*} \]
But finding market supply is not as interesting as the dynamics between the Short-Run & Long-Run
Previously, we referred to the Short-Run Supply Curve as the curved created by P = MC
We are able to say this is the short-run because over a longer time horizon:
In other words, in the Long-Run:
What could determines whether a firm enters or exists the market?
PROFITS
In either case, the fact that profits are not zero has implications for the Long-Run
\[ P < \min \{ ATC(Q^{*}) \} \]
Short-Run
Firms operate at a loss in order to offset some of their FC
Long-Run
Firms exit the market
What happens when we have
\[ P > \min \{ ATC(Q^{*}) \} \]
Short-Run
Firms will produce and earn a positive economic profit
Long-Run
New firms (Firms outside the market) see these positive profits, and enter the industry to collect these profits themselves
Firms entering or exiting the market has a really important feedback effect
Do your best to recall from EC 201:
When the number of firms in an industry increases, what effect does this have on the market price?
It DECREASES the price
When the number of firms in an industry decreases, what effect does this have on the market price?
It INCREASES the price
The feedback has predictable outcomes that we can organize in our minds
\(P > \min\{ATC(Q)\}\)
\[ P = \min\{ATC(Q)\} \]
\(P < \min\{ATC(Q)\}\)
\[ P = \min\{ATC(Q)\} \]
No matter what price is initially, in the Long-Run we will always return to
\[ P = \min\{ATC(Q)\} \]
How do shifts in quantity affect market prices?
Negative Profits
Positive Profits
So if prices in the Long-Run will always be
\[ P = \min\{ATC(Q)\} \]
What does this imply about profits in the Long-Run
There are no economic profits in the Long-Run!
But let’s be careful with interpreting what this means
Saying there are zero economic profits can be a tricky phrase so let’s dive in:
If we know what happens in the Long-Run, then why care about the Short-Run?
The Short-Run is where interesting things happen
Let’s imagine the following market:
Because initial price of 25 is equal to \(\min\{ ATC(Q) \}\) and there are no profits
Now imagine that this product gets much more popular
It should shift to the right (increases)
With an increase in Demand, we see that prices have also increased
With a Supply increase:
We can graph the Supply Curve in the Long-Run
It is simply a flat line at \(P = \min\{ATC(Q)\}\)
In this example we will:
The Cost Function of a firm is
\[ C(Q) = Q^{2} + 8Q + 100 \]
\[ C(Q) = Q^{2} + 8Q + 100 \]
Short-Run Supply is \(\; P = MC\)
\[\begin{align*} MC = \frac{\partial C(Q)}{\partial Q} = 2Q + 8 \end{align*}\]
Set P = MC
\[\begin{align*} P = 2Q + 8 \end{align*}\]
\[ P = 2Q + 8 \]
First, we find the individual firm supply function
\[\begin{align*} P &= 2Q + 8 \\ 2Q &= P - 8 \\ Q &= \frac{P - 8}{2} \end{align*}\]
Market Supply Function will be \(\; N \cdot Q = Q_{S}\)
\[\begin{align*} Q_{S} &= N \cdot Q \\ Q_{S} &= 20 \cdot \left( \frac{P - 8}{2} \right) \\ Q_{S} &= 10P - 80 \end{align*}\]
Market Supply Curve Is:
\[\begin{align*} Q_{S} &= 10P - 80 \\ 10P &= Q_{S} + 80 \\ P &= \frac{Q_{S}}{10} + 8 \end{align*}\]
\[ \text{LR-Supply: } P = \min\{ATC(Q)\} \;\;\;\; \& \;\;\;\; C(Q) = Q^{2} + 8Q + 100 \]
We want an amount of Quantity and we will use the Zero-Profit Condition
Use \(\; MC = ATC(Q)\)
\[\begin{align*} ATC(Q) &= MC \\ Q + 8 + \frac{100}{Q} &= 2Q + 8 \\ Q \cdot \left( Q + 8 + \frac{100}{Q} \right) &= Q \cdot (2Q + 8) \\ Q^{2} + 8Q + 100 &= 2Q^{2} + 8Q \\ Q^{2} &= 100 \\ Q^{*} &= 10 \end{align*}\]
We also need to find \(\; P^{*}\)
\[\begin{align*} MC(Q) &= 2Q + 8 \\ MC(10) &= 2(10) + 8 \\ MC &= 28 \\ \\ \end{align*}\]
Use fact that P = MC
\[\begin{align*} P = MC = 28 \end{align*}\]
Now let’s throw a curveball
The market does not exist in isolation, it is affected by the world
Imagine that there is a sudden event that decreases the Market Price to 20
This raises the following questions:
From our previous work, we know that
\[ P = 2Q^{*} + 8 \]
We can use this information to find \(\;Q^{*}\)
Individual Firm Supply
\[\begin{align*} P &= 2Q^{*} + 8 \\ 20 &= 2Q^{*} + 8 \\ 12 &= 2Q^{*} \\ Q^{*} &= 6 \end{align*}\]
Market Supply
20 Firms are still in the market
\[\begin{align*} Q_{S} &= N \cdot Q^{*} \\ Q_{S} &= 20 \cdot 6 \\ Q_{S} &= 120 \end{align*}\]
We can also ask questions about the Long-Run
What is the Long-Run Effect on \(Q^{*} \; \Rightarrow \;\) Individual Firm Supply
If we assume that the Long-Run Effect on \(Q_{S}\) means that Market Supply will be equal to 100. How many firms remain in the Long-Run?
We know for a fact that in the Long-Run price will return to 28
What is the effect on individual firm supply?
There is NO Long-Run Effect on firm supply
\[\begin{align*} Q^{*} = 10 \end{align*}\]
If we know that \(\; Q_{S} = 100 \;\), how many firms are producing in this market?
\[\begin{align*} Q_{S} &= N \cdot Q^{*} \\ 100 &= N \cdot 10 \\ \frac{100}{10} &= N \\ N &= 10 \end{align*}\]
After the price shock, 10 firms exit the market and 10 firms stay
We just saw how shocks to the market distort both the Short-Run & Long-Run
The Long-Run is very robust and is not really impacted by price shocks. But is this always the case?
When will distortions to equilibrium affect the Long-Run Equilibrium Price?
To answer that, we remember what determines the Long-Run Price
So a shock will only affect the Long-Run Price if it impacts the Minimum Average Total Cost
What effect will the invention of more fuel-efficient cars have on the price of oil?
None! This is a shock to demand and thus the minimum ATC is unaffected
What effect will the invention of more fuel-efficient cars have generally?
What effect will the invention of more efficient drilling technology have on the Long-Run Price of oil?
One very specific type of cost change that we want to consider is Taxation
We will deal with two types of taxes:
LUMP-SUM TAXES
PER-UNIT TAXES
Under this tax structure firms have to pay a One-Time Fee to participate in the market
These form of taxes will NOT affect the firm’s Marginal Costs
The Short-Run Supply Curve is completely unnafected
These will affect the firm’s marginal costs DIRECTLY
Take for example the following firm:
\[ C(Q) = Q^{2} + Q + 20 \]
Where Marginal Costs are:
\[ MC(Q) = 2Q + 1 \]
Let’s impose the per-unit tax \(\tau\) such that the cost function becomes:
\[ C(Q) = Q^{2} + Q + 20 + \color{red}{\tau \cdot Q} \]
What is the Marginal Cost after Taxes?
\[ MC = 2Q + 1 + \tau \]
The Marginal Cost (and then the Supply Curve) is shifted up by the exact amount of the tax, so:
In the Long-Run, firms will leave the market because the tax induced losses
The Long-Run Equilibrium Price is at exactly the original price, plus the tax
Why will the effect on the Long-Run Price be exactly the size of the tax?
Because it will be the case that the minimum ATC increased by exactly the tax \(\, (\tau)\)
For the Cost Function
\[ C(Q) = Q^{2} + 9 + \tau Q \]
We have:
Average Total Cost
\[\begin{align*} ATC &= Q + \frac{9}{Q} + \tau \end{align*}\]
Marginal Cost
\[\begin{align*} MC &= 2Q + \tau \end{align*}\]
We set them equal to each other & the tax cancels out
\[\begin{align*} ATC &= MC \\ Q + \frac{9}{Q} + \color{red}{\tau} &= 2Q + \color{red}{\tau} \end{align*}\]
We see this in the previous example:
\[ ATC = Q + \frac{9}{Q} + \tau \]
\[\begin{align*} ATC &= MC \\ Q + \frac{9}{Q} + \color{red}{\tau} &= 2Q + \color{red}{\tau} \end{align*}\]
EC311 - Lecture 07 | Market Supply